MY LASIK STORY-THE EVOLUTION OF THE TECHNOLOGY
Thursday, September 29th, 2011Many of my Miami patients who return sometime following their LASIK/PRK will enthusiastically relate their life experience as it pertains to their surgery. Here I want to tell my story which basically charts the entire history of LASIK as I was there at the beginning and have grown with the advancements and re-directions.
In 1986, I was introduced to the excimer laser which had been developed at IBM in New York. It was a precision cutting device which was only used to demonstrate how you could cut a square in a strand of human hair; a party trick. Eventually some researcers at Columbia University came up with the idea of aiming the laser at the cornea with the hope of reshaping it and eliminating nearsightedness. The device which had been developed in New York could not be used in the USA thanks to the FDA so I traveled to London and on to Berlin where the procedures were being done. The trips were fun and the technology was spectacular.
My first opportunity to actually use the laser was in 1996, when it finally received FDA approval. Tne LASIK procedure at that time was not in existance. We were aiming the laser at the surface of the cornea without creating a flap; this was PRK, Photorefractive Keratoplasty. We could only treat myopia as there was no algorithm for farsightedness or astigmatism. The procedure worked very nicely for the limited number of patients that were treatable. The down side was that it was a painful postoperative coarse. Because of the pain created by lasering the front of the cornea, the notion of cutting a flap and lasering the interior gained popularity. There turned out to be much less pain with this approach and so began LASIK.
The process of cutting an extremely thin section of cornea became the challenge. One of the earliest and most popular devices was actually developed in Hialeah. These cutting devices are called keratomes. In the early days of LASIK the application and successful use of the various keratomes was a tricky undertaking as the equipment was unforgiving if the operator made the slightest error. There were dislocated flaps, irregular cuts and partial cuts. But since the vast majority of folks did very well without pain we forged on. Ultimately, the keratomes became automated and complications became rare. Surgeons still had in the back of their minds the ultimate safety of the PRK as there is no flap and therefore no flap related problems. At the same time there emerged a class of eye drops known as NSAIDS (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). These drugs eliminated the postoperative pain following the PRK. Thus began the swing back to the old days of PRK. Ofcoarse by now we were treating myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism.
While I watched the excimer laser go through four generational changes, the newest kid on the block is the femtosecond laser. This laser is used to cut a precise flap with minimal complications.
All of this brings us to the present. In my consultations with refractive surgery candidates we discuss these options. Many people want to reduce the risk factor to as close to zero as is possible and elect PRK. Some need to have an immediate visual result and short term recovery period and elect LASIK (the return of vision following PRK can be five to six days). Others have thin corneas wherein PRK is the only option. So it all comes down to fitting the procedure to the patient and not visa versa. In the end, personalized care and attention to detail leads to a happy patient and a happy doc and we all sleep well at night.









